MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3124703087 · doi:10.4337/9781788115483.00013

Seeking safe haven in Canada: geopolitics and border crossings after the Safe Third Country Agreement

2020· book-chapter· en· W3124703087 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jennifer Hyndman, Alison Mountz

Bibliographic record

VenueEdward Elgar Publishing eBooks · 2020
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefugeePolitical scienceGeopoliticsBorder SecurityBorder crossingEnforcementSafe havenCriminologyLawImmigrationSociologyPoliticsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter examines border-crossings as a strategy of human security between Canada and the United States to understand the fraught role of Canada in relation to its powerful neighbour. The 2004 Safe Third Country Agreement prevents most asylum seekers from crossing the land border at designated ports of entry between the two countries. In 2017, President Trump enacted an entry ban on specific nationalities and increased enforcement against undocumented migrants. Asylum seekers from the US began walking across the border to Canada at non-designated ports of entry. While Canada has not generally accepted refugees who are US citizens, people fleeing military conscription during the Vietnam War were accepted. More recently, soldiers refusing to serve in the US occupation of Iraq have made refugee claims, albeit with less success. The chapter illustrates how Canada and the US restrict access to asylum, forcing people to forge their own forms of human security.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.171
Threshold uncertainty score0.961

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0350.010
Scholarly communication0.0130.003
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEdward Elgar Publishing eBooksSame topicCanadian Policy and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207