MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3124703593 · doi:10.59275/j.melba.2021-3581

FlowReg: Fast Deformable Unsupervised Medical Image Registration using Optical Flow

2021· article· en· W3124703593 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Machine Learning for Biomedical Imaging · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMedical Image Segmentation Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchYork UniversityNational Institutes of HealthNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeU.S. Department of Defense
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceImage registrationPixelComputer visionNeuroimagingAffine transformationSimilarity (geometry)Optical flowPattern recognition (psychology)Deep learningImage (mathematics)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work we propose FlowReg, a deep learning-based framework that performs unsupervised image registration for neuroimaging applications. The system is composed of two architectures that are trained sequentially: FlowReg-A which affinely corrects for gross differences between moving and fixed volumes in 3D followed by FlowReg-O which performs pixel-wise deformations on a slice-by-slice basis for fine tuning in 2D. FlowReg-A warps the moving volume using gross global parameters to align rotation, scale, shear, and translation to the fixed volume. A correlation loss that encourages global alignment between the moving and the fixed volumes is employed to regress the affine parameters. The deformable network FlowReg-O operates on 2D image slices and is based on the optical flow CNN network that is adapted to neuroimaging with three loss components. The photometric loss minimizes pixel intensity differences, the smoothness loss encourages similar magnitudes between neighbouring vectors, and a correlation loss that is used to maintain the intensity similarity between fixed and moving image slices. The proposed method is compared to four open source registration techniques ANTs, Demons, SE, and Voxelmorph for FLAIR MRI applications. In total, 4643 FLAIR MR imaging volumes (approximately 255,000 image slices) are used from dementia and vascular disease cohorts, acquired from over 60 international centres with varying acquisition parameters. To quantitatively assess the performance of the registration tools, a battery of novel validation metrics are proposed that focus on the structural integrity of tissues, spatial alignment, and intensity similarity. Experimental results show FlowReg (FlowReg-A+O) performs better than iterative-based registration algorithms for intensity and spatial alignment metrics with a Pixelwise Agreement (PWA) of 0.65, correlation coefficient (R) of 0.80, and Mutual Information (MI) of 0.29. Among the deep learning frameworks evaluated, FlowReg-A or FlowReg-A+O provided the highest performance over all but one of the metrics. Results show that FlowReg is able to obtain high intensity and spatial similarity between the moving and the fixed volumes while maintaining the shape and structure of anatomy and pathology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.558

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it