MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3124821880

Testing of AGARD-B calibration model in the T-38 trisonic wind tunnel

2006· article· en· W3124821880 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dijana Damljanović, Aleksandar Vitić, Đorđe Vuković

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Technical Review · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerospace and Aviation Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWind tunnelCalibrationInstrumentation (computer programming)Marine engineeringEngineeringMeteorologyEnvironmental scienceAerospace engineeringComputer sciencePhysicsMathematicsStatistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, test results of AGARD-B calibration model, performed at the beginning of 2006 in the T-38 trisonic wind tunnel of the Military Technical Institute, are presented. The test results are compared with the results of the tests of the same model performed in 1981 in the IAR (NAE) 5ft trisonic wind tunnel (Canada), and with the results of the test performed in 1986 during the commissioning of the T-38 wind tunnel. Analysis of the test results showed a good agreement with the results obtained in the distinguished IAR (NAE) 5ft wind tunnel, confirming a high quality of air stream in the test section of the T-38, good condition of instrumentation and the correctness of the data reduction algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific Technical ReviewSame topicAerospace and Aviation TechnologyFrench-language works237,207