Évolution de la consommation d'énergie du secteur commercial québécois de 1990 à 1998
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La consommation totale d'énergie du secteur commercial québécois a augmenté de 7, 3% entre 1990 et 1998 (à l'exclusion de l'éclairage des voies publiques). Cet accroissement est attribué à une augmentation de l'activité économique mesurée en fonction de la surface de plancher (12, 9%), des changements dans les conditions météorologiques (-4, 1%), des changements mineurs dans la structure (0, 02) et au changement de l'efficacité énergétique (-0, 8%). À l'exception des établisseements de santé, toutes les composantes du secteur commercial québécois ont enregistré une amélioration de leur intensité énergétique brute. Malgré l'expansion de leur activité telle que mesurée par la surface de plancher, l'intensité énergétique brute de l'ensemble du secteur commercial s'est améliorée en passant de 1, 99 GJ/m 2 en 1990 à 1, 89 GJ/m 2 en 1998. Une comparaison avec l'ensemble du Canada donne des résultats plutôt similaires.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".