MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3124995921 · doi:10.7202/1073289ar

The San Venanzio Chapel in Rome and the Martyr Shrine Sequence

2020· article· fr· W3124995921 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueRACAR Revue d art canadienne · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Religious Studies of Rome
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesMartyrHistoryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les lieux de vénération reliés au culte des martyrs forment des séquences spécifiques à considérer dans le temps et dans l’espace. On se rendra compte qu’elles incluent, en partie ou en totalité, les éléments suivants : un lieu de martyre, un tombeau, une cella memoriae , des chapelles avec chambres funéraires ad sanctos , un sanctuaire collectif du martyre ou martyrium . Une telle combinaison se retrouve chez un groupe de martyrs de Dalmatie et d’Istrie, dont les reliques furent rapportées à Rome par le pape, Jean IV (640-642) et vénérées dans les chapelles latérales ouvrant sur le Baptistère du Latran. C’est à Salone, la capitale de la Dalmatie romaine, que l’on peut voir la plus grande partie des sites et des édifices, mais dont le point culminant de l’ensemble demeure la chapelle de San Venanzio à Rome. Ce martyrium du Latran, sa décoration de mosaïques, et les découvertes archéologiques sans parallèle du site paléo-chrétien de Salone, constituent, lorsque réunis, une source majeure de renseignements non seulement sur un groupe de martyrs et un ensemble d’édifices commémoratifs, mais aussi sur l’évolution historique du culte des martyrs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it