Efficacy and safety of Shexiang Baoxin Pill combined with Western medicine in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The morbidity and mortality of acute myocardial infarction are on the rise, and the efficacy of conventional treatment is limited. Shexiang Baoxin Pill is a kind of proprietary Chinese medicine, which has been widely used in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction in China, and has certain advantages. At present, there is a lack of strict randomized controlled trials to verify the efficacy and safety of Shexiang Baoxin Pill combined with Western medicine in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Therefore, the purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of Shexiang Baoxin Pill combined with Western medicine in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: This is a prospective randomized controlled trial to study the efficacy and safety of Shexiang Baoxin Pill combined with Western medicine in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. It is approved by the Clinical Research Society of our hospital. According to 1:1, the patients will be randomly divided into observation group (Shexiang Baoxin Pill combined with Western medicine group) and control group (routine Western medicine group). The patients in the 2 groups will be treated continuously for 4 weeks and followed up for 3 months. Pay attention to its curative effect index and safety index. The observation indexes included total effective rate of improvement of cardiac function, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), endothelin (ET), nitric oxide (NO) level, interleukin-6 (IL--6), adverse reactions, and so on. We will analyze the structure by SPSS version 19.0. DISCUSSION: This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Shexiang Baoxin Pill combined with Western medicine in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. The results of this experiment will provide clinical basis for Shexiang Baoxin Pill combined with Western medicine in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: OSF Registration number: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/PYJTK.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".