MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3125060818 · doi:10.3168/jds.2020-19514

Effect of photoperiod before and during first gestation on milk production and prolactin concentration in dairy heifers

2021· article· en· W3125060818 on OpenAlexafffund
P. Lacasse, D. Petitclerc

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaPublic Works and Government Services Canada
KeywordsphotoperiodismProlactinIce calvingAnimal scienceLactationBiologyReproductionEndocrinologyInternal medicinePregnancyHormoneMedicineBotanyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Holstein heifers (n = 45) were subjected to treatments according to a 2 × 2 factorial design where the main effects were the photoperiod treatments during the second isometric (ISO, 52-61 wk of age) and the second allometric (ALLO, 62 wk of age to 8 wk before calving) periods of mammary gland development. During the ISO period, heifers were subjected to either a short-day photoperiod (SDP; 8 h light, 16 h dark; n = 22) or a long-day photoperiod (LDP; 16 h light, 8 h dark; n = 23). During the ALLO period, the photoperiodic treatments were either maintained (SDP:SDP, n = 11; LDP:LDP, n = 11) or switched (SDP:LDP, n = 11; LDP:SDP, n = 12). The treatments ended 8 wk before calving. All animals were then subjected to about 16 h of light per day. Serum prolactin (PRL) concentration during the ISO period was greater in heifers exposed to LDP than in those exposed to SDP. For the first 20 wk of the ALLO period, heifers exposed to LDP had greater serum concentration of PRL than those exposed to SDP. On the other hand, previous exposure to LDP during the ISO period reduced the concentration of PRL compared with those exposed to SDP during that period. During the second 20 wk of the ALLO period, PRL concentration remained greater in the serum of heifers then exposed to LDP than SDP, but serum PRL was greater in heifers exposed to LDP during the ISO period. During the last weeks before calving, when all animals were exposed to LDP, previous exposure to LDP during the ALLO period reduced serum PRL. Early-lactation milk (wk 1-5) and energy-corrected milk (wk 2-6) production were higher in the heifers exposed to SDP than in those exposed to LDP during ALLO. Photoperiod had no effect on milk production after that period. In conclusion, the results do not support to the hypothesis that photoperiod affects mammary gland development during the second allometric phase. However, they confirm that a short-day photoperiod in late gestation enhances milk production in the following lactation in primiparous heifers. Using serum PRL as an indicator of the photoperiodic response, we can conclude that responsiveness to the photoperiodic signal is still conditioned by a previous photoperiod several months after it ends.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy ScienceSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207