MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3125070057 · doi:10.1239/jap/1346955339

A Note on ‘Improved Fréchet Bounds and Model-Free Pricing of Multi-Asset Options’ by Tankov (2011)

2012· article· en· W3125070057 on OpenAlexafffund
Carole Bernard, Xiao Jiang, Steven Vanduffel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Probability · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicStochastic processes and financial applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersVrije Universiteit BrusselNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBNP Paribas CardifUniversities Space Research Association
KeywordsCopula (linguistics)MathematicsBivariate analysisPortfolioUpper and lower boundsMathematical economicsEconometricsMathematical optimizationApplied mathematicsStatisticsEconomicsFinanceMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tankov (2011) improved the Fréchet bounds for a bivariate copula when its values on a compact subset of [0, 1]2 are given. He showed that the best possible bounds are quasi-copulas and gave a sufficient condition for these bounds to be copulas. In this note we give weaker sufficient conditions to ensure that the bounds are copulas. We also show how this can be useful in portfolio selection. It turns out that finding a copula as a lower bound plays a key role in determining optimal investment strategies explicitly for investors with some type of state-dependent constraints.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.005
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.011
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0040.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied ProbabilitySame topicStochastic processes and financial applicationsFrench-language works237,207