Uncorrelated discriminant graph embedding for fault classification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Recently, graph embedding methods have been successfully used in process monitoring. To improve the discriminant power, a novel supervised graph embedding method, called uncorrelated discriminant graph embedding (UDGE), is proposed. Different from the unsupervised design of locality preserving projection (LPP), UDGE utilizes both the local geometrical structure and label information to construct the similarity between different data points. The “local geometrical structure” means that each data point can be represented as a combination of its neighbours. Due to add the uncorrelated constraint, the extracted features of UDGE are statistically uncorrelated. Uncorrelated attributes are essential for dimension reduction since they contain minimum redundancy. The application of UDGE is evaluated on the Tennessee Eastman process (TEP) benchmark. Experimental results show UDGE can better separate different types of faults and provide more promising fault diagnosis performance. The code of UDGE is released in https://github.com/htz-ecust/Uncorrelated-Discriminant-Graph-Embedding-for-Fault-Classification .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".