MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3125216610 · doi:10.7202/1074196ar

« Des adolescents terrorisent le nord de la ville »

2020· article· fr· W3125216610 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCriminologie · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCrime, Deviance, and Social Control
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Avant d’investir le champ scientifique qui sert d’appui à ses usages institutionnels au Québec, la catégorie de « gang de rue » s’est d’abord constituée au sein du champ médiatique dans un contexte de tensions, de luttes et d’une profonde labilité. Dans une perspective généalogique, notre objectif est d’analyser les luttes et les instabilités qui ont donné lieu à son émergence, ainsi que les mécanismes discursifs par lesquels elle est parvenue à interpeller les pouvoirs publics et à s’imposer comme stable et nécessaire. En amont de la panique morale qui entoure l’émergence médiatique du gang de rue, l’« événement discursif » permet d’interroger le discours à partir duquel le gang de rue obtient son existence sociale concrète. Privilégiant la méthode d’analyse du discours, le travail empirique s’appuie sur la constitution d’un corpus de presse composé d’articles des journaux La Presse et Journal de Montréal publiés entre 1987 et 1989.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.720
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.333
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.074 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it