Bibliographic record
Abstract
Avant d’investir le champ scientifique qui sert d’appui à ses usages institutionnels au Québec, la catégorie de « gang de rue » s’est d’abord constituée au sein du champ médiatique dans un contexte de tensions, de luttes et d’une profonde labilité. Dans une perspective généalogique, notre objectif est d’analyser les luttes et les instabilités qui ont donné lieu à son émergence, ainsi que les mécanismes discursifs par lesquels elle est parvenue à interpeller les pouvoirs publics et à s’imposer comme stable et nécessaire. En amont de la panique morale qui entoure l’émergence médiatique du gang de rue, l’« événement discursif » permet d’interroger le discours à partir duquel le gang de rue obtient son existence sociale concrète. Privilégiant la méthode d’analyse du discours, le travail empirique s’appuie sur la constitution d’un corpus de presse composé d’articles des journaux La Presse et Journal de Montréal publiés entre 1987 et 1989.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".