A Quantitative Index to Assess the Influence of Joint Fit-Up on Pipeline Weld Root Discontinuities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Field experience on pipelines suggests that under the unique conditions of tie-in welding, a high-low offset at the inner pipe wall is related to an increased occurrence of latent root weld discontinuities such as cold cracking. Codes and standards offer conflicting and unclear guidelines regarding acceptance criteria for high-low offset. This study presents a numerical index to quantify the influence of non-ideal joint geometry on the latent discontinuity susceptibility of the root pass for circumferential pipeline welds. The index is based on the stress concentration at the root and the angular distortion associated with plastic strains produced during welding. This index relates geometric considerations such as pipe diameter, wall thickness, and the cross section of the root pass with welding procedure variables and the mechanical properties of the pipeline material. Although this study is meant for steel pipelines, the conclusions obtained are also applicable to other materials. The index presented is a contribution towards an objective criterion for acceptance of high-low offset during field welding, ranking the susceptibility to latent discontinuities as a function of variables available to practitioners during field welding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".