MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3125313029 · doi:10.14288/1.0395674

Small mammals and mesomammals in a post-fire and salvage-logged landscape

2021· article· en· W3125313029 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Angelina J. Kelly

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wildfire influences the ecosystem function of fire adapted ecosystems. Climate change has shifted the natural fire regime of North American forests to tend to larger, higher severity fires. While wildfire is a natural disturbance, it is detrimental to the forestry industry. Salvage logging is a common practice in British Columbia (BC), Canada, forests following wildfire, and it often differs from standard harvesting practices in that it removes timber from larger expanses of land. The impacts of post-fire salvage logging on wildlife are poorly understood and may compromise the ecosystem function of post-fire landscapes. To better understand the impacts of wildfire and post-fire salvage logging on forest ecosystems, I determined the population responses of deermice (Peromyscus maniculatus), southern red-backed voles (Myodes gapperi), snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus), and red squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus). I studied these important species in a post-fire and salvage-logged interior Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) forest on the Chilcotin Plateau, BC. I live-trapped small mammals to estimate their abundances in mature, post-fire, and post-fire salvage-logged habitats. Post-fire regenerating forest supported the highest abundances of southern red-backed voles in the study area. However, post-fire salvage logging reduced southern red-backed vole populations and supported mainly deermice, a generalist species. Snowshoe hare densities were lowest in post-fire salvage-logged sites. These sites supported significantly fewer hares than regenerating post-fire stands that burned eight-nine years ago or mature forest. Early seral post-fire regenerating stands supported the highest densities of snowshoe hares. Red squirrel densities were highest in mature forest sites, but squirrels also used eight to nine-year-old post-fire regenerating sites. Post-fire salvage logging significantly changed vegetation structure by reducing tree basal area, rendering sites unsuitable for snowshoe hares, red squirrels, and southern red-backed voles. Post-fire salvage logging delayed the recolonization of burned areas by voles, snowshoe hares, and red squirrels and removed valuable regenerating forests from the landscape. Given the increasing size of wildfires and the scale of post-fire salvage logging, the decreases in abundances of small mammal species caused by post-fire salvage logging could impact the health of forest ecosystems across entire landscapes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.151
Teacher spread0.145 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→Same topicWildlife Ecology and Conservation→French-language works237,207→