Transcriptomics‐Based and AOP‐Informed Structure–Activity Relationships to Predict Pulmonary Pathology Induced by Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study presents a novel strategy that employs quantitative structure-activity relationship models for nanomaterials (Nano-QSAR) for predicting transcriptomic pathway level response using lung tissue inflammation, an essential key event (KEs) in the existing adverse outcome pathway (AOP) for lung fibrosis, as a model response. Transcriptomic profiles of mouse lungs exposed to ten different multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) are analyzed using statistical and bioinformatics tools. Three pathways "agranulocyte adhesion and diapedesis," "granulocyte adhesion and diapedesis," and "acute phase signaling," that (1) are commonly perturbed across the MWCNTs panel, (2) show dose response (Benchmark dose, BMDs), and (3) are anchored to the KEs identified in the lung fibrosis AOP, are considered in modelling. The three pathways are associated with tissue inflammation. The results show that the aspect ratio (κ) of MWCNTs is directly correlated with the pathway BMDs. The study establishes a methodology for QSAR construction based on canonical pathways and proposes a MWCNTs grouping strategy based on the κ-values of the specific pathway associated genes. Finally, the study shows how the AOP framework can help guide QSAR modelling efforts; conversely, the outcome of the QSAR modelling can aid in refining certain aspects of the AOP in question (here, lung fibrosis).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it