Vertebral Ischemic Necrosis in Diabetic Lumbosacral Radiculoplexus Neuropathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy (DLRPN), or diabetic amyotrophy, is an infrequent neurovascular complication of diabetes thought to result from immune-mediated infarction of peripheral nerve branches (1). DLRPN has not previously been reported in association with infarction of the vertebral bone, which itself is a rare occurrence, typically in the setting of aortic surgery and spinal cord infarction (2). We report a case of simultaneous DLRPN and vertebral bony infarction in a patient with type 2 diabetes, highlighting the unifying vascular etiology responsible for both these uncommon pathologies. A 47-year-old man of Nepalese origin presented to hospital with a 2-week history of relatively acute-onset left lumbar pain, numbness and paresthesia in the left obturator and saphenous nerve distributions, and marked proximal left leg weakness. His past health was notable for a 4-year history of type 2 diabetes, well controlled with sitagliptin, canagliflozin, and metformin. On examination, there was Medical Research Council (MRC) grade 2/5 paresis of the left hip flexor and hip adductor muscles, with grade 1/5 power of knee extension. The left patellar reflex was absent. Electrodiagnostic studies showed a reduced left femoral motor potential and denervation at the …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".