MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3125546336 · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.273530

Inference via Kernel Smoothing of Bootstrap P Values

2006· preprint· en· W3125546336 on OpenAlexaff
Jeffrey S. Racine, James G. MacKinnon

Bibliographic record

VenueAgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) · 2006
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResamplingInferenceMathematicsStatisticsSmoothingStatistical hypothesis testingBootstrapping (finance)Kernel (algebra)StatisticTest statisticRange (aeronautics)Kernel smootherNull hypothesisKernel methodStatistical inferenceComputer scienceEconometricsArtificial intelligenceSupport vector machineDiscrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resampling methods such as the bootstrap are routinely used to esti- mate the ¯nite-sample null distributions of a range of test statistics. We present a simple and tractable way to perform classical hypothesis tests based upon a kernel estimate of the CDF of the bootstrap statistics. This approach has a number of appealing features: i) it can perform well when the number of bootstraps is ex- tremely small, ii) it is approximately exact, and iii) it can yield substantial power gains relative to the conventional approach. The proposed approach is likely to be useful when the statistic being bootstrapped is computationally expensive.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.400
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.155
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)Same topicStatistical Methods and InferenceFrench-language works237,207