MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3125615034 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd474

The Extraordinary Outburst in the Massive Protostellar System NGC 6334 I-MM1: Spatiokinematics of Water Masers during a Contemporaneous Flare Event

2021· article· en· W3125615034 on OpenAlexaff
James O. Chibueze, Gordon MacLeod, Jakobus M. Vorster, Tomoya Hirota, C. L. Brogan, T. R. Hunter, Ruby van Rooyen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaserPhysicsAstrophysicsProper motionOutflowVery-long-baseline interferometryAccretion (finance)AstronomyJet (fluid)Very Long Baseline ArrayPosition angleShock (circulatory)Bow shock (aerodynamics)StarsShock waveQuasarGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Following an eruptive accretion event in NGC 6334I-MM1, flares in the various maser species, including water masers, were triggered. We report the observed relative proper motion of the highly variable water masers associated with the massive star-forming region, NGC 6334I. High velocity H2O maser proper motions were detected in five maser clusters, CM2-W2 (bow-shock structure), MM1-W1, MM1-W3, UCHII-W1, and UCHII-W3. The overall average of the derived relative proper motion is 85 km s−1. This mean proper motion is in agreement with the previous results from VLA multiepoch observations. Our position as well as the velocity variance and covariance matrix analyses of the maser proper motions show its major axis to have a position angle of −79.°4, cutting through the dust cavity around MM1B and being aligned in the northwest–southeast direction. We interpret this as the axis of the jet driving the CM2 shock and the maser motion. The complicated proper motions in MM1-W1 can be explained by the combined influence of the MM1 northeast–southwest bipolar outflow, the CS(6−5) north–south collimated bipolar outflow, and the radio jet. The relative proper motions of the H2O masers in UCHII-W1 are likely not driven by the jets of the MM1B protostar but by MM3-UCHII. Overall, the post-accretion burst relative proper motions of the H2O masers trace shocks of jet motion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→