MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3125647212

Littérature et dynamiques collectives. Compte rendu de Denis Saint-Amand (dir.), La Dynamique des groupes littéraires, « Situations », Presses universitaires de Liège, 2016 et de Anthony Glinoer et Michel Lacroix (dir.) La Littérature contemporaine au collectif, Fabula/Les colloques [en ligne]

2021· article· fr· W3125647212 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fréderic Thomas

Bibliographic record

VenueCOnTEXTES. Revue de sociologie de la littérature · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le livre coordonne par Denis Saint-Amand s’interesse aux logiques et dynamiques des groupes litteraires, en se focalisant sur la modernite recente ; de la seconde moitie du xixe siecle aux annees 1970. De son cote, le dossier mis en ligne par Fabula constitue les Actes de deux Journees d’Etudes, realisees les 21 et 22 novembre 2019, a l’Universite de Sherbrooke, et se consacre a la litterature contemporaine. La these qui y est presentee est celle du moment charniere des annees 1968 et de « l’...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.712
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCOnTEXTES. Revue de sociologie de la littératureSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207