Insular seizures and epilepsies: Ictal semiology and minimal invasive surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The increased identification of seizures with insular ictal onset, promoted by the international development of stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG), has led to the recent description of larger cohorts of patients with insular or insulo-opercular epilepsies than those previously available. These new series have consolidated and extended our knowledge of the rich ictal semiology and diverse anatomo-clinical correlations that characterized insular seizures. In parallel, some experiences have been gained in the surgical treatment of insular epilepsies using minimal invasive procedures. RECENT FINDINGS: The large majority of patients present with auras (mostly somatosensory and laryngeal) and motor signs (predominantly elementary and orofacial), an underlying focal cortical dysplasia, and an excellent postoperative seizure outcome. Many other subjective and objective ictal signs, known to occur in other forms of epilepsies, are also observed and clustered in five patterns, reflecting the functional anatomy of the insula and its overlying opercula, as well as preferential propagation pathways to frontal or temporal brain regions. A nocturnal predominance of seizure is frequently reported, whereas secondary generalization is infrequent. Some rare ictal signs are highly suggestive of an insular origin, including somatic pain, reflex seizures, choking spells, and vomiting. Minimal invasive surgical techniques have been applied to the treatment of insular epilepsies, including Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided laser ablation (laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT)), radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC), gamma knife radiosurgery, and responsive neurostimulation. Rates of seizure freedom (about 50%) appear lower than that reported with open-surgery (about 80%) with yet a significant proportion of transient neurological deficit for LITT and RFTC. SUMMARY: Significant progress has been made in the identification and surgical treatment of insular and insulo-opercular epilepsies, including more precise anatomo-clinical correlations to optimally plan SEEG investigations, and experience in using minimal invasive surgery to reduce peri-operative morbidity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".