Connexin36 localization along axon initial segments in the mammalian CNS.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electrical synapses formed by gap junctions occur at a variety of neuronal subcellular sites in the mammalian central nervous system (CNS), including at somatic, dendritic and axon terminal compartments. Numerous electrophysiological studies using mice and rats, as well as computer modelling approaches, have predicted the additional occurrence of electrical synapses between axons near their emergence from neuronal somata. Here, we used immunofluorescence methods to search for localization of the neuronal gap junction-forming protein connexin36 (Cx36) along axon initial segments (AISs) labelled for the AIS marker ankyrinG. Immunofluorescent Cx36-puncta were found to be associated with AISs in several CNS regions of mice, including the spinal cord, inferior olive and cerebral cortex. Localization of Cx36-puncta at AISs was confirmed by confocal single scan and 3D imaging, immunofluorescence intensity profiling and high resolution structured illumination microscopy (SIM). AISs measuring up to 30 µm in length displayed typically a single Cx36-punctum and the incidence of these long AISs displaying Cx36-puncta ranged from 3% to 7% in the inferior olive and in various layers of the cerebral cortex. In the inferior olive, the gap junction associated protein zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) was found to be co-localized with Cx36-puncta on AISs, indicating that these puncta have some of the molecular constituents of gap junctions. Our results add to the neuronal subcellular locations at which Cx36 is deployed, and raise possibilities for its involvement in novel functions in the AIS compartment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".