Bibliographic record
Abstract
Edited CollectionRimmer, Matthew (Ed.) (2015) Indigenous Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research. Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, Mass.This Handbook considers the international struggle to provide for proper and just protection of Indigenous intellectual property. Leading scholars consider legal and policy controversies over Indigenous knowledge in the fields of international law, copyright law, trademark law, patent law, trade secrets law, and cultural heritage. This collection examines national developments in Indigenous intellectual property from around the world. As well as examining the historical origins of conflicts over Indigenous knowledge, the volume examines new challenges to Indigenous intellectual property from emerging developments in information technology, biotechnology, and climate change.Taking an interdisciplinary approach unmatched by any other book on this topic, this thoughtful Handbook considers the international struggle to provide for proper and just protection of Indigenous intellectual property (IP).In light of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples 2007, expert contributors assess the legal and policy controversies over Indigenous knowledge in the fields of international law, copyright law, trademark law, patent law, trade secrets law, and cultural heritage. The overarching discussion examines national developments in Indigenous IP in the United States, Canada, South Africa, the European Union, Australia, New Zealand, and Indonesia. The Handbook provides a comprehensive overview of the historical origins of conflict over Indigenous knowledge, and examines new challenges to Indigenous IP from emerging developments in information technology, biotechnology, and climate change.Practitioners and scholars in the field of IP will learn a great deal from this Handbook about the issues and challenges that surround just protection of a variety of forms of IP for Indigenous communities.Contents:The Legacy of David UnaiponMatthew Rimmer,Introduction: Mapping Indigenous Intellectual PropertyMatthew RimmerPART I INTERNATIONAL LAW1. The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: A Human Rights Framework for Intellectual Property RightsMauro Barelli2. The World Trade Organization, The TRIPS Agreement and Traditional KnowledgeTania Voon3. The World Intellectual Property Organization and Traditional KnowledgeSara Bannerman4. The World Indigenous Network: Rio+20, Intellectual Property, Indigenous Knowledge, and Sustainable DevelopmentMatthew RimmerPART II COPYRIGHT LAW AND RELATED RIGHTS5. Government Man, Government Painting? David Malangi and the 1966 One-Dollar NoteStephen Gray6. What Wandjuk WantedMartin Hardie7. Avatar Dreaming: Indigenous Cultural Protocols and Making Films Using Indigenous ContentTerri Janke8. The Australian Resale Royalty Right for Visual Artists: Indigenous Art and Social JusticeRobert Dearn and Matthew RimmerPART III TRADE MARK LAW AND RELATED RIGHTS 9. Indigenous Cultural Expression and Registered DesignsMaree Sainsbury10. The Indian Arts and Crafts Act: The Limits of Trademark AnalogiesRebecca Tushnet 11. Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions within the New Zealand Intellectual Property Framework: A Case Study of the Ka Mate HakaSarah Rosanowski12 Geographical Indications and Indigenous Intellectual PropertyWilliam van CaenegemPART IV PATENT LAW AND RELATED RIGHTS13. Pressuring ‘Suspect Orthodoxy’: Traditional Knowledge and the Patent SystemChidi Oguamanam14. The Nagoya Protocol: Unfinished Business Remains UnfinishedAchmad Gusman Siswandi15. Legislating on Biopiracy in Europe: Too Little, too Late?Angela Daly16. Intellectual Property, Indigenous Knowledge, and Climate ChangeMatthew RimmerPART V PRIVACY LAW AND IDENTITY RIGHTS17. Confidential Information and Anthropology: The Politics of the Digital Knowledge EconomySarah Holcombe18. Indigenous Cultural Heritage in Australia: The Control of Living HeritagesJudith Bannister19. Dignity, Trust and Identity: Private Spheres and Indigenous Intellectual PropertyBruce Baer Arnold,20. Racial Discrimination Laws as a Means of Protecting Collective Reputation and IdentityDavid RolphPART VI INDIGENOUS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: REGIONAL PERSPECTIVES21. Diluted Control: A Critical Analysis of the WAI 262 Report on Maori Traditional Knowledge and CultureFleur Adcock, 22. Traditional Knowledge Governance Challenges in CanadaJeremy de Beer and Daniel Dylan23. Intellectual Property Protection of Traditional Knowledge and Access to Knowledge in South AfricaCaroline Ncube24. Traditional Knowledge Sovereignty: The Fundamental Role of Customary Law in Protection of Traditional KnowledgeBrendan Tobin
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".