MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3125726708 · doi:10.46298/arima.1864

Solutions de similitude d'un jeu différentiel stochastique

2006· article· fr· W3125726708 on OpenAlexaff
Mario Lefebvre

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue Africaine de la Recherche en Informatique et Mathématiques Appliquées · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicStochastic processes and financial applications
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsInfinitesimalStochastic differential equationConstant (computer programming)Calculus (dental)Applied mathematicsMathematical analysisComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A two-dimensional controlled stochastic process defined by a set of stochastic differential equations is considered. Contrary to the most frequent formulation, the control variables appear only in the infinitesimal variances of the process, rather than in the infinitesimal means. The differential game ends the first time the two controlled processes are equal or their difference is equal to a given constant. Explicit solutions to particular problems are obtained by making use of the method of similarity solutions to solve the appropriate partial differential equation. On considère un processus stochastique commandé bidimensionnel défini par un ensemble d'équations différentielles stochastiques. Contrairement à la formulation la plus fréquente, les variables de commande apparaissent dans les variances infinitésimales du processus, plutôt que dans les moyennes infinitésimales. Le jeu différentiel prend fin lorsque les deux processus sont égaux ou que leur différence est égale à une constante donnée. Des solutions explicites à des problèmes particuliers sont obtenues en utilisant la méthode des similitudes pour résoudre l'équation aux dérivées partielles appropriée.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.334
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue Africaine de la Recherche en Informatique et Mathématiques AppliquéesSame topicStochastic processes and financial applicationsFrench-language works237,207