La Responsabilidad Social Empresarial en Uruguay. Una visión comparada desde la ciudadanía y desde las empresas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El objetivo de este trabajo es describir el comportamiento de las empresas uruguayas y laopinión de los ciudadanos sobre la responsabilidad social empresarial (RSE). Para ello seutilizaron datos de las encuestas aplicadas a la opinión pública y las empresas sobre RSE. Eltrabajo presenta un análisis descriptivo comparado de los principales resultados de dichasencuestas con el objetivo de aportar al conocimiento de un tema en el que existen pocosantecedentes de investigación académica en Uruguay. El análisis de los datos muestra uncierto grado de conocimiento de la población sobre el tema de RSE. Se destaca que los ciudadanostienen una opinión más favorable en cuanto al desempeño de las empresas que elde las propias empresas. Además, existe un cierto balance entre las acciones empresarialesen RSE y la valoración de la opinión pública de aquellas áreas consideradas importantes
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".