MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3125860312 · doi:10.1115/ipc2020-9786

Operational Modal Response Characterization of a Buried Pipe Structure

2020· article· en· W3125860312 on OpenAlexaff
Hao-Bin Chen, Ron Hugo, R.C.K. Wong, Simon Park

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 3: Operations, Monitoring, and Maintenance; Materials and Joining · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccelerometerVibrationAcousticsModal analysisModalShakerStructural engineeringModal testingStructural health monitoringFrequency responseTransient responseSensitivity (control systems)EngineeringMaterials scienceComputer scienceElectronic engineeringPhysicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract As a novel non-invasive structural health monitoring (SHM) technique for application to buried pipelines, in-situ vibration-based detection offers an approach to achieve continuous monitoring. Modal characteristics are often quantified using vibration signals, with traditional modal analysis performed using either impact-response testing or mechanical-shaker excitation. Both methods, however, are not suitable for a buried pipeline. In this research work, the operational modal response of a buried-pipe structure is investigated, and the application of transient flow event detection is presented. Experiments are conducted on a buried 160-inch horizontal stainless-steel pipe section with an inner diameter of 2-inch. Soil compaction is performed to 95% of the maximum dry density (proctor compaction). During experiments, water flow rate through the pipe (Reynolds number) is increased and turbulent pressure fluctuations provide the varying structural excitation source. Vibration measurements are made using one tri-axial and four single-axis accelerometers. Accelerometers directly mounted to the pipe are to perform on-pipe measurement to investigate the operational modal response of the buried pipe structure. Accelerometers positioned in soil are to investigate the vibration transmission through the soil in both the horizontal and vertical directions, examining the feasibility of the modal response characterization through non-contact measurement. The operational modal response collected through on-pipe measurement showing that vibration energy is decreased due to the soil and the vibration of the axial direction (along the pipe) has highest sensitivity than the other two directions with increasing Reynolds number. The abnormal signal induced by a transient flow event is visualized using short-time spectral analysis, and its propagation and source are determined using acoustic methods. The vibration transmission of the buried pipe propagating through the soil is heavily attenuated both horizontally and vertically.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume 3: Operations, Monitoring, and Maintenance; Materials and JoiningSame topicGeophysical Methods and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207