Pelaksanaan Diversi Terhadap Perkara Tindak Pidana yang dilakukan oleh Anak
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tujuan penelitian menganalisis pelaksanaan diversi terhadap perkara tindak pidana yang dilakukan oleh anak di Wilayah Hukum Gorontalo. Tipe penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis empiris dengan penekanan pada fakta yuridis yang ada di lapangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hakikat pelaksanaan diversi dalam perkara tindak pidana yang dilakukan oleh anak yaitu diversi menekankan pada pemulihan kembali seperti pada keadaan yang semula, dilatarbelakangi keinginan untuk menghindari stigma anak sebagai pelaku kejahatan dan menghindari efek negatif terhadap jiwa dan perkembangan anak tersebut dalam keterlibatannya dalam sistem peradilan pidana. Pelaksanaan diversi di wilayah hukum provinsi Gorontalo belum efektif dikarenakan masih banyak perkara anak, ditangani secara prosedur formal dengan kata lain gagal atau tidak dilaksanakan diversi.
 The research objective is to analyze the implementation of diversion of criminal cases committed by children in the Gorontalo Legal Area. This type of research is empirical juridical research with an emphasis on juridical facts in the field. The results showed that the nature of the implementation of diversion in criminal cases committed by children, namely diversion emphasizes recovery back to its original state, motivated by the desire to avoid the stigma of children as perpetrators of crime and avoid negative effects on the child's psyche and development in their involvement in the system. criminal justice. The implementation of diversion in the jurisdiction of Gorontalo province has not been effective because there are still many cases of children, handled in a formal procedure, in other words failing or not being carried out by diversion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".