MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3125975236 · doi:10.3917/sc.025.0071

Le crime d’Alias Grace, une vérité en mi-dire

2019· article· fr· W3125975236 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
É. Toullec

Bibliographic record

VenueSavoirs et clinique · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicHistorical and Scientific Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’héroïne d’ Alias Grace , un roman de Margaret Atwood, est accusée d’un double meurtre en 1843 au Canada. Au moment du dénouement, l’auteure détourne l’intrigue criminelle vers un questionnement du rapport de la vérité au discours qui la sous-tend. Ce n’est pas sans évoquer Lacan et son aphorisme « la vérité a structure de fiction », ainsi que sa théorie des quatre discours. En particulier, la rencontre entre les discours du maître et de l’hystérique ouvre la voie à une autre compréhension des logiques d’aliénation et de domination à l’œuvre dans le récit. Le roman offre de plus un témoignage passionnant sur les errances de la science face à l’hystérie avant la naissance de la psychanalyse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.190
Threshold uncertainty score0.377

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0180.022
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSavoirs et cliniqueSame topicHistorical and Scientific StudiesFrench-language works237,207