A Distributed Pulse-Based Synchronization Protocol for Half-Duplex D2D Communications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In distributed device-to-device (D2D) communications, no common reference time is available and the devices must employ distributed synchronization techniques. In this context, pulse-based synchronization, which can be implemented by distributed phase-locked loops is preferred due to its scalability. Several factors degrade the performance of pulse-based synchronization, such as duplexing scheme, clock skew and propagation delays. Furthermore, in distributed networks, devices should be aware of the synchronization status of others in order to initiate data communications. To address these prevailing issues, we first introduce a half-duplex timing-advance synchronization algorithm wherein each device alternates between being a transmitter and receiver in their exchange of synchronization pulses at each clock period. Based on this algorithm, we propose a novel fully-distributed pulse-based synchronization protocol for half-duplex D2D communications in 5G wireless networks. The protocol allows participating devices to become aware of the global synchronization status, so that they can complete the synchronization process ideally at the same time and proceed to data communication. In simulation experiments over multi-path frequency selective channels, the proposed synchronization protocol is shown to outperform a benchmark approach from the recent literature over a wide range of conditions, e.g., clock skew, number of devices, and network topology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.019 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it