MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3125990348 · doi:10.5167/uzh-172594

Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap

2019· article· en· W3125990348 on OpenAlexaff
Leor Barack, Vítor Cardoso, S. Nissanke, Thomas P. Sotiriou, Abbas Askar, Gianfranco Bertone, E. Bon, Diego Blas, Richard Brito, T. Bulik, Clare Burrage, Christian T. Byrnes, Chiara Caprini, M. Chernyakova, Piotr T. Chruściel, Monica Colpi, Valeria Ferrari, Daniele Gaggero, Jonathan Gair, J. García-Bellido, S. F. Hassan, Lavinia Heisenberg, M. Hendry, I. S. Heng, Carlos Herdeiro, Tanja Hinderer, A. Horesh, Bradley J. Kavanagh, Bence Kocsis, M. Krämer

Bibliographic record

VenuePortsmouth Research Portal (University of Portsmouth) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsPerimeter Institute
FundersHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryMinisterio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital, Gobierno de EspañaJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSGeneralitat ValencianaPartnership for Advanced Computing in Europe AISBLTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma KurumuSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónDeutscher Akademischer AustauschdienstEuropean Regional Development FundGovern de les Illes BalearsEuropean CommissionSmithsonian InstitutionFlatiron HealthScience and Technology Facilities CouncilStrongNemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs HivatalAustrian Science FundNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsGeneral relativityGravitational waveDark energyLIGOTheoretical physicsGravitational-wave observatoryCosmologyBlack hole (networking)Astronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations242
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePortsmouth Research Portal (University of Portsmouth)Same topicPulsars and Gravitational Waves ResearchFrench-language works237,207