MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3126066525

The Ill Wind that Blows from Europe: Implications for Canada's Economy

2014· article· en· W3126066525 on OpenAlex
Pierre L. Siklos

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueC.D. Howe Institute Commentary · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRecessionEconomicsShock (circulatory)Spillover effectFinancial crisisAusterityInternational economicsEconomyMacroeconomicsPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Speculation about the consequences of a break-up of the eurozone, a worsening sovereign debt crisis or a prolonged recession in the European Union have all in recent years made the headlines. At first glance, the effect that such events might have on the Canadian macroeconomy might appear small. After all, Canada’s trade in goods and services and financial flows to and from the euro area are dwarfed by our economic relationship with the United States. Significant spillover effects, however, likely would arise out of any major economic or financial shock originating from the globe’s largest economic block (as measured by gross domestic product, GDP). The sovereign debt crisis in the eurozone exposed major fault lines in the economic stability of the common currency area. The indirect exposure of Canadian banks – and of the Canadian economy more generally – from a eurozone economic shock ought to represent a pressing source of concern for Canada’s policymakers.The continued uncertain outlook for the global and US economy also suggests that there is a real danger of another “perfect storm” such as the one that affected the world economy in 2008 and 2009. Canada might not escape next time around with only a short-lived recession, nor is it a given that its financial sector would emerge largely unscathed, notwithstanding Canada’s reputation for the quality of its financial regulation and supervision. This Commentary estimates a small macroeconomic model for Canada that explicitly incorporates financial sector influences. Then, foreign shocks with real and financial elements from the eurozone and the United States are added to the model to investigate the potential for spillover effects. The study also considers some counterfactuals, by imagining a large, negative and permanent economic shock from the eurozone, and compares the results with estimates based on observed data.The Commentary concludes that negative shocks from the real and financial sectors of the US and eurozone economies do spillover into the Canadian economy. Clearly, US shocks dominate, but eurozone shocks cannot be ignored. Counterfactual experiments suggest that, under eurozone worst-case scenarios, Canada’s economy would suffer a substantial drop of almost 8 percent in real GDP after two and a half years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.718
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it