Ground-state and decay properties of neutron-rich <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Nb</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>106</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ground-state properties of neutron-rich $^{106}\mathrm{Nb}$ and its $\ensuremath{\beta}$ decay into $^{106}\mathrm{Mo}$ have been studied using the CARIBU radioactive-ion-beam facility at Argonne National Laboratory. Niobium-106 ions were extracted from a $^{252}\mathrm{Cf}$ fission source and mass separated before being delivered as low-energy beams to the Canadian Penning Trap, as well as the X-Array and SATURN $\ensuremath{\beta}$-decay-spectroscopy station. The measured $^{106}\mathrm{Nb}$ ground-state mass excess of $\ensuremath{-}66202.0(13)$ keV is consistent with a recent measurement but has three times better precision; this work also rules out the existence of a second long-lived, $\ensuremath{\beta}$-decaying state in $^{106}\mathrm{Nb}$ above 5 keV in excitation energy. The decay half-life of $^{106}\mathrm{Nb}$ was measured to be 1.097(21) s, which is $8%$ longer than the adopted value. The level scheme of the decay progeny, $^{106}\mathrm{Mo}$, has been expanded up to $\ensuremath{\approx}4\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{MeV}$. The distribution of decay strength and considerable population of excited states in $^{106}\mathrm{Mo}$ of $J\ensuremath{\ge}3$ emphasizes the need to revise the adopted ${J}^{\ensuremath{\pi}}={1}_{}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ ground-state spin-parity assignment of $^{106}\mathrm{Nb}$; it is more likely to be $J\ensuremath{\ge}3$.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".