MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3126250037 · doi:10.1139/cjss-2020-0090

Effect of temperature on microbial residue dynamics in a temperate farmland soil

2021· article· en· W3126250037 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wei Zhang, Shuhan Dong, Ming Nie, Chao Liang, Xiaochen Zhang, Hongbo He, Xudong Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Soil Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTemperate climateAgroecosystemResidue (chemistry)Crop residueIncubationSoil carbonEnvironmental chemistryChemistryMicroorganismDecompositionAgronomyEnvironmental scienceSoil waterSoil scienceEcologyBacteriaBiologyAgriculture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microorganisms mediate soil organic carbon (SOC) turnover, and microbial residues contribute a significant portion to SOC storage in temperate agroecosystems. However, little is known about the direct effect of temperature on microbial residues associated with SOC sequestration/decomposition. We assessed microbial residue dynamics in a 28 d incubation conducted at four temperatures (5, 15, 25, and 35 °C). Microbial residues did not change with time from 5 to 25 °C. However, at 35 °C, fungal residues decomposed significantly with time, and the decomposition rate was higher than SOC. Considering the important contribution of fungal residues to stable-C pool, our findings indicated warming may be detrimental to C stability in this temperate soil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Soil Science→Same topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics→French-language works237,207→