MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Increasing Cell Throughput and Network Capacity in a Real-world HetNet Environment

2020· article· en· W3126293709 on OpenAlexafffund
Haijun Gao, Japjot Singh Bawa, Raman Paranjape

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersUniversity of Regina
KeywordsHeterogeneous networkComputer scienceCluster analysisThroughputHotspot (geology)Distributed computingComputer networkWirelessWireless networkArtificial intelligenceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wireless cellular networks have been extensively developed for the past decades from 3G to 5G. In this paper, a novel algorithm is proposed to increase the cell throughput in a small cell indoor environment. The algorithm combines k-means clustering and cell-splitting technique. Instead of solely using k-means clustering to cluster locations of users and small cells, an indicator is assisted to help identify potential antennas that are useful for increasing cell throughput in the optimization process. In addition, simulations and a series of data collections for verifying our algorithm are performed in a real-world LTE-A HetNet (heterogeneous network). The simulation results indicate that our algorithm can boost cell throughput of the whole system by up to 43% compared to the initial setting of directly using cell-splitting. The results of the measured data show that the algorithm can improve the cell throughput of the hotspot by about 36% in terms of basic cell-splitting settings. This algorithm will be beneficial for the network when it does not have enough capacity for users in small cell environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207