MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3126319562 · doi:10.15068/00162388

‘In the Covid’: Some Reflections for Our Resonant Situation

2020· article· en· W3126319562 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of King's CollegeDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPleasureCuriosityRelation (database)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)State (computer science)State of emergencyCharacter (mathematics)LocalitySociologyAestheticsEpistemologyPolitical sciencePsychologyPhilosophyPoliticsLawSocial psychologyLinguisticsMedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a series of loosely connected reflections the author attempts to situate the COVID-19 emergency relative to a more general sense of crisis in the early twenty-first century. French thinkers Bernard Stiegler and Michel Deguy are deployed to grasp the ecological character of this moment. The language and figures of confinement and de-confinement are considered with pleasure and curiosity throughout. The real conditions of a region much less affected by the virus than many others and the challenges and paradoxes of locality-in-emergency that are implied by this fortunate state of affairs are brought into relation to the broader world situation. Navigating the social changes underway and to come is briefly evoked leading to questions of culture leisure and education in conclusion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.142
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it