An Anxious Border: De-facto Spectacles at the Frontier of the Republic of Abkhazia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article explores the spatial border dynamics existing between the contemporary de-facto Republic of Abkhazia and the Republic of Georgia. It focuses on the (un-) making of borders by exploring the material dynamics of contested statehood in a post-conflict situation. It does this by looking at how the “air of sovereignty” is reinforced through materiality, legal and illegal spectacles along the borderline.I make three arguments. First that the spectacles on the Abkhazian side of the border are meant to present the narrative of sovereignty in order to quell an existential uncertainty that comes with the being a de-facto state. Second, that spectacles on the Georgian side of the border are meant to present a narrative of continuation of the 1992–1993 conflict, thus portraying Abkhazia as part of the Republic of Georgia. Last, both legal and illegal border crossings contribute to the air of sovereignty and legality of the border.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it