Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface for Mixed FSO-RF Systems With Co-Channel Interference
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS) is an emerging technology that can achieve reconfigurable radio propagation environments for beyond 5G/6G wireless systems by smartly tuning the signal reflection via a large number of low-cost passive reflecting elements. In this letter, we investigate the effect of co-channel interference (CCI) on RIS-based dual-hop mixed free-space optical (FSO)-radio frequency (RF) communication systems. The source node, equipped with multiple FSO apertures, transmits subcarrier intensity modulated symbols on the FSO link subjected to Gamma-Gamma (GG) distributed atmospheric turbulence with pointing errors (PEs). It is assumed that the relay-RIS and RIS-destination links follow Rayleigh distribution. The destination node is corrupted by multiple CCI (each following Rayleigh distribution). The performance of the considered system is evaluated by deriving novel closed-form expressions for the outage probability (OP) and bit error rate (BER). It is shown through numerical results that RIS-based dual-hop mixed FSO-RF system provide a significant performance enhancement in comparison to a traditional dual-hop mixed FSO-RF system even in presence of CCI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".