French-Canadian Novels from the Nineteenth into the Twentieth Century
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter traces the roots and development of the French-Canadian novel from the nineteenth into the twentieth century. A contested form in Europe, where commentators questioned its cultural value and usefulness to society, the novel’s status was additionally fraught in French Canada. Here, it was perceived as a product of the ‘Old World,’ shaped to meet the needs and to reflect the values of foreign readers. Throughout the nineteenth and well into the twentieth century, the French-Canadian novel remained a vehicle for variously negotiating or consolidating the emergent national character. Following the foundational development of ‘belles lettres’ in the late-eighteenth and early nineteenth century, the first novels appeared in Quebec in the 1830s and 1840s. While displaying obvious debts to metropolitan influences, these inaugural novels also set precedents in theme, setting, and characterization. In addition to meeting the challenges of writing representative fictions, French-Canadian novelists had also to negotiate pressures exerted by the censorial clerical elite. The clash between social liberals and conservatives dominated literary production at the turn of the twentieth century. The themes and forms of French-Canadian fiction bear witness to the unique historical and sociocultural circumstances under which the novel developed here.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.023 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".