Diagnóstico de valores en una empresa hotelera para el desarrollo de una estrategia de valores impulsada desde su equipo directivo / Values Analysis in a Hotel Company to Develop the Values Strategy Promoted by its Management Team
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Las empresas hoteleras cubanas buscan la excelencia en los servicios; por ello es fundamental desarrollar valores alineados a la estrategia organizacional. Esta investigacion indaga en el nivel de desarrollo alcanzado por las cinco dimensiones necesarias para la gestion de una estrategia de valores en una empresa hotelera perteneciente a Islazul S.A. Se diagnostica el nivel de desarrollo de los valores en el equipo de direccion y se realiza un analisis comparativo desde dos perspectivas: individual y grupal. Mediante encuestas, entrevistas y analisis documental, se expresa un alto desarrollo de los valores, principalmente en la dimension grupal, y un nivel medio de interes en la direccion. Teniendo en cuenta estos resultados se propone una estrategia de valores negociable, asi como las acciones para su implementacion. Cuban hotel companies seek excellence in services; therefore, it is essential to develop values aligned with the organizational strategy. This research investigates the level of development reached by the five dimensions necessary for the management of a strategy of values in a hotel company belonging to Islazul S.A. The level of values development in the management team is diagnosed and a comparative analysis is made from two perspectives: individual and group. Through surveys, interviews and documentary analysis, a high development of values is shown, mainly in the group dimension, and an average level of interest from the management. These results are taken into account to propose a negotiable values strategy, as well as actions for its implementation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".