Microvascular and mechanical improvements following bariatric surgery in the obese; mechanistic insights from advanced & automated quantitative perfusion cardiac MRI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Guy"s and St Thomas" Charity University College London Hospital Biomedical Research Centre Background In people with obesity, bariatric surgery reduces mortality, heart failure and coronary disease, improving metabolic (blood sugar, lipid profile, inflammation) and cardiovascular (diastolic/systolic function, filling pressure, cardiac remodelling) parameters. Myocardial microvascular function is a candidate causal link of metabolic to structural cardiac abnormalities. Purpose We hypothesised that bariatric surgery could improve myocardial microvascular and mechanical function in both those with and without diabetes. Methods Before and six months after bariatric surgery, 24 subjects with obesity were assessed with haematology, biochemistry and advanced CMR (cines, vasodilator adenosine stress and rest fully-automated quantitative perfusion mapping, tissue-tracking (CVI42, post processing). Results. Mean age was 49± 12 years, 35%(8) were male, 63%(15), had hypertension, 17 (71%) had diabetes. Surgery resulted in decreases in BMI (44 ± 7 to 34 ± 6 kg/m2 p = 0.0001) and HbA1c (57 ± 16 to 42 ± 9mmol/mol p = 0.0001). EF% and absolute LV end-diastolic volumes remained unchanged, but mass regressed and myocardial contraction fraction (ratio of stroke volume and LV volume) increased (see Table). There were also strain improvements (radial 35 ± 8.8 to 37.3 ± 8.7 %p = 0.029) (circumferential -19.8 ± 2.3 vs -20.7 ± 3% p = 0.017), although longitudinal did not improve (-16.3 ± 3.2 to -15.9 ± 3% p = 0.25). Myocardial perfusion significantly improved (stress myocardial blood flow, MBF 2.35 ± 0.71 to 2.80 ± 0.98 ml/g/min p = 0.008; myocardial perfusion reserve MPR 2.47 ± 0.78 to 2.97 ± 0.95 p = 0.005). Improvement in stress MBF and MPR from pre-operative to post-operative was higher in the non-diabetics (n = 7 (29%)) than the diabetics (n = 17 (71%)) (stress MBF: 1.15 ± 1.00 vs 0.16 ± 0.39ml/g/min p = 0.002) MPR: (1.09 ± 0.73 vs 0.25 ± 0.66 p = 0.011). Conclusion At 6 months, bariatric surgery results in beneficial myocardial remodelling and substantial improvements in myocardial microvascular function. These improvements occur most in those without diabetes suggesting that there may be reversible and irreversible components to microvascular dysfunction. Perfusion and strain variables Variable Pre-op (n = 24) Post-op (n = 24) p-value LVEDV (ml) 163 ± 28 161 ± 29 0.64 EF (%) 70 ± 8 70 ± 7 0.78 Stroke volume (ml) 113 ± 19 111 ± 21 0.6 LV Mass (g) 117 ± 25 103 ± 21 0.001 Myocardial contraction fraction 94 ± 14 105 ± 14 0.001 LVEDV - left ventricular end-diastolic volume, EF - ejection fraction Abstract Figure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".