Influence of gap filling on mechanical properties of composite-aluminum single-lap single-bolt hybrid joints
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Composite-aluminum structures exist in aircraft structures generally. It is easy to cause gap between mating surfaces in composite-aluminum assembled structures with the curing deformation of composite. The composite-aluminum, single-lap, single-bolt joints were utilized to investigate the influence of forced assembly, liquid shim and peelable fiberglass shim on the mechanical properties of assembled structures. A steel gasket that removed the middle part was used in the joint to make a gap. The 3D Digital Imagine Correlation (3D-DIC) system was utilized to measure the strain field of specimens and the progressive damage model was created in ABAQUS. The results show that the shim filling can significantly increase the tension stiffness and peak load of the joint compare with forced assembly. As the shim thickness changes, the effects of the liquid shim and the peelable fiberglass shim on the tensile stiffness and peak load shows different. The liquid or peelable fiberglass shim can reduce the strain value around the hole and the peelable fiberglass shim has a better result than liquid shim. The squeeze between the bolt and composite laminate has a greater impact on matrix damage and fiber-matrix shear damage, while the secondary bending has a greater impact on matrix damage and fiber damage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".