MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3126583916 · doi:10.1101/2020.08.11.20172932

Development of a duplex real-time PCR assay for the differentiation of <i>Blastomyces dermatitidis</i> and <i>B. gilchristii</i> and a retrospective study of blastomycosis in New York (2005-2019)

2020· preprint· en· W3126583916 on OpenAlexaff
Mitchell Kaplan, YanChun Zhu, Julianne V. Kus, Lisa R. McTaggart, Vishnu Chaturvedi, Sudha Chaturvedi

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFungal Infections and Studies
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
FundersCenters for Disease Control and PreventionNew York State Department of Health - Wadsworth CenterU.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesNew York State Department of HealthNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBlastomyces dermatitidisBlastomycosisBlastomycesTaqManDuplex (building)BiologyMicrobiologyOutbreakVirologyPolymerase chain reactionImmunologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Blastomycosis due to Blastomyces dermatitidis and B. gilchristii is a notable cause of respiratory mycoses in North America with recurrent outbreaks. We developed a highly sensitive, specific, and reproducible Taqman duplex real-time PCR assay for the differentiation of B. dermatitidis and B. gilchristii . The new assay permitted retrospective analysis of Blastomyces cultures (2005 to 2019), and primary clinical specimens (2013-2019) from NY patients. Blastomyces dermatitidis was the causal agent for the majority of 38 cases while B. gilchristii was implicated in five cases; a rare finding reported from New York. The duplex real-time PCR assay will be useful for further understanding of ecology and epidemiology of blastomycosis caused by B. dermatitidis and B. gilchristii .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicFungal Infections and StudiesFrench-language works237,207