MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3126631836 · doi:10.1111/febs.15759

Voltage‐gated calcium channel nanodomains: molecular composition and function

2021· review· en· W3126631836 on OpenAlexafffund
María A. Gandini, Gerald W. Zamponi

Bibliographic record

VenueFEBS Journal · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsNeurotransmissionActive zoneSynaptic vesicleVoltage-dependent calcium channelCalcium channelNeuroscienceBiophysicsFunction (biology)Cell biologySynaptic plasticityChemistryN-type calcium channelCalciumBiologyVesicleT-type calcium channelBiochemistryReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Voltage‐gated calcium (Ca V ) channels and their regulation by proteins at the synaptic cleft play a critical role in neurotransmission. These interactions fine‐tune the synaptic response through the regulation of Ca 2+ entry into the presynaptic terminal and trigger the fusion of vesicles filled with neurotransmitters and peptides. Regulation of Ca V channel intrinsic properties and their numbers at the active zones shape the timing and strength of synaptic function. Here, we provide an overview of a number of proteins reported to be part of Ca V channel nanodomains at the synaptic cleft and the repercussions of these interactions for Ca V channel trafficking, tethering at the active zone, and regulation of their biophysical properties. We summarize the current state of knowledge by which Ca V channels are regulated at presynaptic sites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEBS JournalSame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207