MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3126633134

Theory of Constraints for Sustainable Inventory Management in Downstream Supply Chain

2017· article· en· W3126633134 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicOperations Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheory of constraintsSupply chainDownstream (manufacturing)BusinessSustainabilityIndustrial organizationSupply chain managementSupply chain risk managementProcess managementComputer scienceEnvironmental economicsOperations managementService managementMarketingEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many firms have benefited from Theory of constraints implementation helping them in achieving ambitious goals. Theory of constraints uses inherent potential in supply to turnaround businesses. This paper uses case study approach to explore the existing implementation model of Theory of constraints especially in downstream supply chain and uncovers the associated challenges involved in the implementation. As a novel contribution to the already existing body of knowledge of Theory of constraints, a robust new model of implementation of Theory of constraints is presented, which can be of great help for supply chains of consumer products companies in performing sustainably.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.551
Threshold uncertainty score0.685

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it