"Traversée de la Mangrove" de Maryse Condé: une trame touffue de relations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Para explicitar el titulo "Traversée de la mangrove" por Maryse Condé, analizamos la intriga densa de diversas relaciones en la novela. Primeramente, examinamos las relaciones entre los elementos naturales (arbol, barro, sal) de un manglar y la gente que vive en "Rivière au Sel". Segundamente, describimos las relaciones entre lenguajes hablado y escrito, entre los personajes masculinos y femeninos, y religión. Finalmente, estudiamos la originalidad de la escritora en esta novela : otras historias dentro de esta historia, las relaciones de esta novela con otros textos, y algunas figuras poéticas. We analyzed the dense network of "Traversée de la mangrove", a novel by Maryse Condé, in order to try to make the title explicit. First, we established links between natural elements, trees, mud, salt in the mangrove and the people living in Rivière au Sel. Then, we described relations between oral and written languages, between male and female characters, and with religion. At last, we showed the originality of the author’s writing in this novel, such as mirror images (mise en abîme), relations with other texts, and poetical devices. Dans le but d’expliciter notre titre, nous avons analysé la trame touffue de relations entre les éléments naturels, la culture et l’écriture dans le roman de Maryse Condé : "Traversée de la mangrove". Dans un premier temps, nous avons tenté d’établir des relations entre l’arbre, la boue, le sel de la mangrove et les habitants de Rivière au Sel; puis les relations entre l’oral et l’écrit dans cette société, entre les personnages masculins et féminins, et avec la religion; enfin, nous avons montré la singularité de l’écriture de Maryse Condé dans ce roman : la mise en abyme, les relations intertextuelles, et les figures poétiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".