Two Cases of Polyethylene Granuloma After Distal Femoral Endoprosthesis With All-Polyethylene Tibia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Limited literature exists on complications specific to the all-polyethylene tibial component in distal femoral replacement (DFR). Unlike in primary arthroplasty with polyethylene components, polyethylene granuloma has not been reported in DFR with an all-polyethylene tibia. Here, we report 2 cases of polyethylene granuloma in patients with primary bone sarcoma who underwent DFR with an all-polyethylene tibia. Radiologically, evidence of intraosseous granuloma formation and periprosthetic osteolysis was observed at the anterior tibial metaphysis. Both patients underwent an operative debridement of polyethylene granuloma and necrotic tissues, followed by a revision to a long-stem, cemented metal-backed tibia with impacted allograft to fill the defect. Polyethylene granuloma should be considered a differential diagnosis in the presence of a periprosthetic lytic lesion after DFR with an all-polyethylene tibial component.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".