MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3126693352 · doi:10.1002/essoar.10506005.1

Quantifying the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on air quality in downtown Toronto using open-path Fourier transform spectroscopy

2021· article· en· W3126693352 on OpenAlexaffabout
Yuan You, Brendan Byrne, Orfeo Colebatch, Dylan B. A. Jones, Jinwoong Kim, R. L. Mittermeier, Felix Vogal, Kimberly Strong

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCOVID-19 impact on air quality
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiurnal temperature variationAir quality indexEnvironmental scienceMorningTrace gasAtmospheric sciencesOzoneClimatologyMeteorologyGeographyGeologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the global COVID-19 pandemic, anthropogenic emissions of air pollutants and greenhouse gases, especially traffic emissions in urban areas, have declined significantly. Long-term measurements of trace gas concentrations in urban areas can be used to quantify the impact of emission reductions on local air quality. Open-path Fourier transform infrared (OP-FTIR) spectroscopy is a non-intrusive technique that can be used to simultaneously measure multiple atmospheric trace gases in the boundary layer. This study investigates the reduction of surface CO, CO2 , and CH4 mole fractions during the lockdown in downtown Toronto, Canada, which is the fourth largest city in North America. The mean daily CO mole fraction anomaly (ΔCO) for the period from March 14 to May 18, 2020 declined by 46 ± 16% compared to the period before lockdown from January 13 to March 13, 2020. The mean daily ΔCO during the lockdown also declined relative to the same period in previous years: by 50 ± 20% relative to 2019 and by 44 ± 25% relative to 2018. Changes in the diurnal variations of CO, CO2 and CH4 during the lockdown are also investigated and compared to 2019 and 2018. Both CO and CO2 show early morning maxima on weekdays corresponding to rush hour. The change of the amplitude of the diurnal variation in CO during the lockdown is significant, compared to the period before lockdown. The differences in the diurnal variation in CO during the same two periods in 2019 and 2018 are not significant. Ratios of CO/CO2 anomalies show seasonal variations, which are also likely due to seasonal changes of emissions from local sources. These results show that the COVID-19 lockdown in Toronto modified surface mole fractions, diurnal variations, and ratios of air pollutants monitored by OP-FTIR. In addition, measured CO mole fractions are compared with simulated CO mole fractions by WRF-STILT to assess the relationship between atmospheric measurements and urban emissions from Toronto.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.177
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCOVID-19 impact on air qualityFrench-language works237,207