Pulmonary Adenosquamous Cell Carcinoma With Systemic Lymphadenopathy due to Immunoglobulin G4-Related Disease: A Case Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 75-year-old man with diabetes mellitus showed elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) level at his regular visit. Computed tomography scan showed a lung tumor in his left lower lobe and systemic lymphadenopathy including abdominal lymph nodes. The patient was diagnosed as primary pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma with systemic lymph node metastasis. Thereafter, unexpected steroid pulse therapy for accidental acute exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia rapidly shrank lymphadenopathy. At this time, we also found elevated serum immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) level (385 mg/dL). Considering these findings, we doubted the lymph nodes metastases at the initial staging, and then corrected cancer-staging (C-staging) from inferior vena cava (IVC) to inferior abdomen (IA). In addition, during the steroid tapering, sudden onset and uncontrollable left pneumothorax required surgical approach. Curative-intent left lower lobectomy with lymphadenectomy was performed for the lung cancer. Pathological findings revealed coexistence of adenosquamous carcinoma and infiltration of IgG4-positive plasma cells in the resected mediastinal lymph node. We detected 384 IgG4-positive cells per high power field. IgG4/IgG-positive cell ratio was 54%. Based on these findings, the diagnosis of IgG4-related disease with primary adenosquamous carcinoma (p-stage IIIA) was confirmed. The patient died 24 days after surgery because of another acute exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia. Our case alerts oncologists to IgG4-related disease as a possible underlying comorbidity which may confuse pretreatment clinical stage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".