MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3126726356 · doi:10.1109/lnet.2021.3058292

Securing the Internet of Vehicles: A Deep Learning-Based Classification Framework

2021· article· en· W3126726356 on OpenAlexafffund
Tejasvi Alladi, Varun Kohli, Vinay Chamola, F. Richard Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Networking Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceThe InternetIdentification (biology)Authentication (law)Deep learningComputer securityArtificial intelligenceComputer networkMachine learningWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Along with the various technological advancements, the next generation vehicular networks such as the Internet of Vehicles (IoV) also bring in various cybersecurity challenges. To effectively address these challenges, in addition to the existing authentication techniques, there is also a need for identification of the misbehaving entities in the network. This letter proposes a deep learning-based classification framework to identify potential misbehaving vehicles before the communication requests from the On Board Units (OBUs) of the vehicles can be entertained by the network infrastructure such as the Road Side Units (RSUs). The evaluated metrics demonstrate the performance of the proposed classification approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Networking LettersSame topicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)French-language works237,207