MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Reliability Analysis of Dependent Systems using Copula Bayesian Networks: A Case Study

2021· article· en· W3126765911 on OpenAlexaff
Guofeng Xie, Liudong Xing, Faisal Khan, Liping He

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicRisk and Safety Analysis
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCopula (linguistics)Bayesian networkComputer scienceDependence analysisBayesian probabilityReliability engineeringReliability (semiconductor)Data miningMachine learningEconometricsArtificial intelligenceMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Bayesian Network (BN) is a technique that utilizes updating, adapting and discrete-time-based analysis properties for system reliability analysis. Although the BN is a powerful technique, it still faces the challenge of modelling non-linear complex correlations of process components. This paper presents a Copula Bayesian Network (CBN) model to address challenge of modeling non-linear relationships. The superiority of the CBN model lies in integrating the advantage of Copula functions in modelling complex dependent structures with the cause-effect relationship reasoning of process variables using BN. Application of the CBN model is illustrated through a detailed reliability analysis of an example mud pump system. The results reveal the influence of different types of Copula functions and different parameters on the system reliability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Materials Science and EngineeringSame topicRisk and Safety AnalysisFrench-language works237,207