MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Time-Delay Signature Suppressed Microwave Chaotic Signal Generation Based on an Optoelectronic Oscillator Incorporating a Randomly Sampled Fiber Bragg Grating

2020· article· en· W3126813994 on OpenAlexafffund
Yu Huang, Jianping Yao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicChaos control and synchronization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFiber Bragg gratingChaoticMicrowaveSIGNAL (programming language)Signature (topology)Materials scienceOptoelectronicsElectronic engineeringComputer scienceOptical fiberPhysicsOpticsTelecommunicationsEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a technique to generate microwave chaotic signals with suppressed time-delay signature (TDS) based on an optoelectronic oscillator (OEO) incorporating a randomly sampled fiber Bragg grating (RS-FBG). The key component in the system is the RS-FBG, which is designed and fabricated with multiple randomly distributed sub-FBGs through random spatial sampling. The incorporation of the RS-FBG in an OEO would introduce multiple randomly distributed feedbacks with randomly distributed time delays, which would reduce the TDS in the generated microwave chaotic signal. The architecture of the proposed OEO and its operation for TDS suppression are discussed. A modified Ikeda time-delayed model to analyze the complex dynamics employing a RS-FBG is investigated. Both simulation and experimental results indicate that the TDS of the generated chaotic signals can be suppressed by 23 dB as compared with an OEO without using a RS-FBG.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicChaos control and synchronizationFrench-language works237,207