Association of blood pressure and BMI to corrected QT interval in young adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hypertension is often associated with obesity. Uncontrolled hypertension can lead to uncorrected cardiac dysautonomia that makes cardiac repolarization abnormally prolonged. Modern dietary habits, stress, and bad lifestyle habits make young adults vulnerable to hazards of health. We planned to study the association of body mass index (BMI) and blood pressure (BP) with corrected QT (QTc) intervals in young adults. After obtaining the written informed consent, 171 subjects were randomly selected in the age group of 18-35 years. A general history and physical examination were done before recording the BMI and BP. A 12-lead electrocardiogram was recorded and QTc calculated using Bazett's formula. The values obtained were compared and statistical analysis done. Of the 171 subjects 14.03% were hypertensive. The QTc interval was found to be prolonged in females and it is prolonged with age, BMI, and BP. QTc was significantly increased among the prehypertensive and hypertensive group and with the overweight and (or) obese BMI group compared with the normotensives and normal BMI group suggesting an altered autonomic homeostasis. This warrants lifestyle modification at a younger age to reduce the cardiovascular risk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".