MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Proton Beam Testing of SEU Sensitivity of M430FR5989SRGCREP, EFM32GG11B820F2048, AT32UC3C0512C, and M2S010 Microcontrollers in Low-Earth Orbit

2020· article· en· W3126884181 on OpenAlexafffund
Stefan Damkjar, I. R. Mann, D.G. Elliott

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadiation Effects in Electronics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsProtonBeam (structure)Orbit (dynamics)MicrocontrollerLow earth orbitPhysicsSensitivity (control systems)Angle of incidence (optics)Nuclear physicsSingle event upsetNuclear engineeringOpticsComputer scienceAerospace engineeringEngineeringComputer hardwareStatic random-access memorySatelliteElectronic engineeringAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Proton beam testing was performed on several microcontrollers using proton energies between 2.4 MeV and 57.6 MeV. A remotely operated robotic testing platform was developed to improve testing throughput by minimizing the need for human intervention in the radiation vault. Sensitivity to SEU, SEL, and SEFI faults was determined. Using the measured SEU cross-section data along with NASA's radiation belt model, AP8, in-orbit SEU rates were determined for an ISS orbit. Testing was also done while varying the incidence angle of the proton beam which shows that the rate of SEL and SEFI faults increased significantly with shallower incidence angle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadiation Effects in ElectronicsFrench-language works237,207